The Nike Wildhorse 7 Trail Running Shoe impressed me across the board with only a few characteristics that I did not like. There’s also a gaiter collar that wraps and hugs the ankle to keep unwanted debris out, which I personally like a lot, and there’s also a segmented rock plate to protect the foot running over jagged terrain.
Multidirectional lugs are built-in for traction on steep ascents and descents to keep you secure on your running surface. In the Nike Wildhorse 7, you get a durable rubber on the outsole and a reinforced upper that will allow you to handle rugged trails with obstacles that may cause high degrees of abrasion, which is something the Nike Pegasus Trail 3 lacks.
The Wildhorse 7 is marketed for tackling rough and technical trails and its design seems to coincide perfectly with Nike’s proposed description. I’ve enjoyed testing and training in most of my Nike road running shoes, so I was super excited to try the Nike Wildhorse 7 and take them out on my favorite trails. No other shoe comes close to having the same effect.The Nike Wildhorse 7 is the seventh model in the Nike Wildhorse trail running shoe lineup. When we perform this calculation for every pair of races in our data and measure the effect of switching to any kind of popular shoe, we see that runners who switch to these Nike shoes improved significantly more than runners who switched to any other kind of shoe. But in our data, there are thousands of instances when pairs of runners ran in the same two races. In Berlin, runners who switched to Vaporfly or Next% shoes improved their times more than runners who did not, on average.įor two athletes and a single pair of races, this might not tell us much.
We could then examine the change in performance of two similar runners - people with similar race performances and, ideally, training regimens - and compare the improvement of a runner who switched shoes with a runner who did not. Crucially for our purposes, about a thousand of those runners ran both races, and a subset of them reported racing in different shoes. At last year’s Berlin Marathon, for example, more than 10,000 runners uploaded race information to Strava, and this year, more than 14,000 did.
(There was no meaningful difference between the Vaporfly and Next% shoes when we measured their effects separately. We found that a runner wearing the most popular versions of these shoes available to the public - the Zoom Vaporfly 4% or ZoomX Vaporfly Next% - ran 4 to 5 percent faster than a runner wearing an average shoe, and 2 to 3 percent faster than runners in the next-fastest popular shoe. These kinds of shoes from Nike - which feature carbon plates and springy midsole foam - have become an explosive issue among runners, as professional and amateur racers alike debate whether the shoes save so much energy that they amount to an unfair advantage.Ī new analysis by The New York Times, an update of the one conducted last summer, suggests that the advantage these shoes bestow is real - and larger than previously estimated.Īt the moment, they appear to be among only a handful of popular shoes that matter at all for race performance, and the gap between them and the next-fastest popular shoe has only widened. Photograph by Joe Toth/The INEOS 1:59 Challenge via AP illustration by The New York Times
0 kommentar(er)
